Archives
Archives
| From: | Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | billk@×××××××××.au | ||
| Cc: | Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>, gentoo-dev List <gentoo-dev@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo vs. the FHS | ||
| Date: | Wed, 24 Sep 2003 03:45:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1064374387.28164.269.camel@ht.gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo vs. the FHS by William Kenworthy |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 18:21, William Kenworthy wrote: |
| 2 | > As someone who works with a number of different OS's daily, from solaris |
| 3 | > to various flavours of linux - the FHS and standards compliance is a |
| 4 | > godsend. The FHS has a few warts, and slavish compliance with it is not |
| 5 | > desired, but generally, it is a "good thing". Just because commercial |
| 6 | > apps use it, doesnt mean its bad for everyone else, they just benefit |
| 7 | > too. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Agreed. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Sincerely, |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Daniel |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |