Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au>
To: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev List <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo vs. the FHS
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:21:26
Message-Id: 1064362874.10322.90.camel@rattus.localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo vs. the FHS by Luke-Jr
1 As someone who works with a number of different OS's daily, from solaris
2 to various flavours of linux - the FHS and standards compliance is a
3 godsend. The FHS has a few warts, and slavish compliance with it is not
4 desired, but generally, it is a "good thing". Just because commercial
5 apps use it, doesnt mean its bad for everyone else, they just benefit
6 too.
7
8 BillK
9
10 On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 07:11, Luke-Jr wrote:
11 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
12 > Hash: SHA1
13 >
14 > On Tuesday 23 September 2003 10:12 pm, dams@×××.fr wrote:
15 > > FHS is made so that f*cking proprietary application get well installed on
16
17
18
19 --
20 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo vs. the FHS Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo vs. the FHS Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>