Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default | ||
| Date: | Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:31:25 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130127003118.26642.qmail@stuge.se | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 | > having a standardized kernel with a few flags probably isn't a bad idea. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | That doesn't scale at all. Suggest instead take a .config as input to |
| 5 | the emerge, maybe something like savedconfig for busybox, and add |
| 6 | shortcuts for common options. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | That way, the same mechanism can be used for arbitrarily complex |
| 9 | configurations too. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | //Peter |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |