| 1 |
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:23:23 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> I can't agree unless I am missing something. Doesn't the majority of |
| 4 |
> ebuilds actually require most of DEPEND (well, the part common with |
| 5 |
> RDEPEND) to be installed on the target? I'm thinking of the shared |
| 6 |
> libraries mostly. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
"The part common with RDEPEND" is a different issue. We're talking |
| 9 |
about what the usual thing to do is for dependencies that are in |
| 10 |
DEPEND but not RDEPEND. A typical example here is a binary that is |
| 11 |
executed as part of the build process. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives