| 1 |
On 15-07-2008 15:32:32 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm at the point that -Wl,-O1 appears to be successful. It's time to |
| 5 |
> toss on -Wl,--hash-style=gnu. The issue is that we need glibc 2.5 or |
| 6 |
> higher and not mips. So one solution is to put the following: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> default/linux: LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu" |
| 9 |
> default/linux/mips: LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1" |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> However, this means we'll have to put a has_version check in |
| 12 |
> profile.bashrc of default/linux, which seems a bit cludgy.. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Any suggestions? Comments? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'm just wondering... unless it has changed since last time I installed |
| 17 |
Gentoo Linux, but isn't the installation manual on purpose conservative |
| 18 |
with CFLAGS? make.conf.example also does not much more than |
| 19 |
"-march -O2 -pipe". -O1 to the linker feels conservative to me. Still, |
| 20 |
do we really need to go any further? Why not make additional pointers |
| 21 |
to possible values for LDFLAGS like we do for C(XX)FLAGS in the |
| 22 |
installation manual? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 27 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives