Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To:	gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-dev] pet feature: mtime preservation (was [gentoo-dev-announce] Council Summary from meeting on April 09, 2009)
Date:	Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:19:28
Message-Id:	`20090416231921.794109fb@snowcone`
In Reply to:	[gentoo-dev] pet feature: mtime preservation (was [gentoo-dev-announce] Council Summary from meeting on April 09, 2009) by "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)"

1	-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2	Hash: SHA1
3
4	On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:15:46 +0200
5	"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <hkBst@g.o> wrote:
6	> and from #gentoo-council:
7	> [do apr 9 2009] [22:41:47] <dberkholz> those of you with a pet
8	> feature, feel free to respond to the summary on -dev if you have some
9	> compelling reason why it's super easy to get in and can't be pushed
10	> back. keep in mind there's no reason we need to take forever for EAPI
11	> 4, either
12
13	Can we at least hold off on these until EAPI 3 is approved? I doubt
14	any of the many groups involved in EAPIs will be able to keep up with
15	the workload otherwise...
16
17	- --
18	Ciaran McCreesh
19	-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20	Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
21
22	iEYEARECAAYFAknnrusACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEZBgCffO/OlEDubIUdVyyOtJ73gwuW
23	+BQAoKz/D5u2ihDY9icN+ZOyQpoATFce
24	=jB6X
25	-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----