| 1 |
Marius Mauch wrote: [Thu Oct 26 2006, 12:02:59PM CDT] |
| 2 |
> Ok, as there is currently a lot of work going on for GLEP 23 |
| 3 |
> (licese based visibility filtering aka ACCEPT_LICENSE) the topic of |
| 4 |
> license groups came up, in particular the way how they should be |
| 5 |
> (technically) defined. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The simplest way is a line based format |
| 8 |
> <groupname> <license1> ... <licenseN> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
At the risk of reopening a large can of worms, can somebody explain to |
| 11 |
me why the license groups idea won't run into the same conceptual issues |
| 12 |
that derailed GLEP 29 (USE groups)? Am I missing something obvious? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-g2boojum- |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Grant Goodyear |
| 17 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 18 |
g2boojum@g.o |
| 19 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
| 20 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |
Archives