| 1 |
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 20:55:02 +0100 |
| 2 |
David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Tuesday 05 August 2008 20:45:33 Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 5 |
> > It really baffles me that some developers are forcefully retired for |
| 6 |
> > anti-social behavior, but are not consequently banned from the |
| 7 |
> > places where they display this behavior, such as our MLs and IRC |
| 8 |
> > channels. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'm not aware of any ex-developers who were forcefully retired and |
| 11 |
> who display anti-social behaviour. Please explain, giving concrete |
| 12 |
> examples of such behaviour and reasons why you think it qualifies as |
| 13 |
> "anti-social". |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Somehow I read the sentence differently: it seems pointless to ban |
| 16 |
competent people for so-called anti-social behavior from easily |
| 17 |
pushing technical contributions and still let them contribute to other |
| 18 |
communication medias where such an anti-social behavior is much more |
| 19 |
obvious. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Nowhere have I seen any accusation in Ben's mail, keep cool ;) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Alexis. |
Archives