Archives
Archives
| From: | waebbl <waebbl@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Anti-spam for goose | ||
| Date: | Fri, 22 May 2020 06:18:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdPeHEOpiYr_AMs0iOKqiziiOwggevB+PZgtGa=AQs0+GBVBw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Anti-spam for goose by Viktar Patotski |
||
| 1 | Am Do., 21. Mai 2020 um 22:14 Uhr schrieb Viktar Patotski < |
| 2 | xp.vit.blr@×××××.com>: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | I believe that we are all have forgotten about Donald Knuth: Premature |
| 5 | > optimisation is the root of all evill. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I won't consider spam protection to be a optimisation. Instead, the |
| 9 | occurence of spam is IMO a proper use-case from a developers PoV. Therefore |
| 10 | thinking about how to handle it, is a necessary task. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | With Regards |
| 14 | Bernd <waebbl@×××××.com> |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Anti-spam for goose | Gordon Pettey <petteyg359@×××××.com> |