Archives
Archives
| From: | foser <foser@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem | ||
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:31:40 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1087990299.9412.2.camel@rivendell | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem by Jason Huebel |
||
| 1 | This is solution I & it is really duplication of information, because if |
| 2 | the arch maintainer thinks something can go stable, it's not more than |
| 3 | logical he will make it stable. So you only have to indicate which arch |
| 4 | (es) is/are the maintainers. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | - foser |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> |