Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:40:51
Message-Id: 20040623163811.7b9f712b@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem by foser
1 On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:31:39 +0200 foser <foser@g.o> wrote:
2 | This is solution I & it is really duplication of information, because
3 | if the arch maintainer thinks something can go stable, it's not more
4 | than logical he will make it stable. So you only have to indicate
5 | which arch(es) is/are the maintainers.
6
7 Not true. Simple example (maintainer's arch is x86):
8
9 "This would be marked stable except that the x86-only turbo super
10 accelerator (written in assembly) no longer works with files over
11 1GByte."
12
13 --
14 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox)
15 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
16 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>