| 1 |
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 11:38, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> Not true. Simple example (maintainer's arch is x86): |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> "This would be marked stable except that the x86-only turbo super |
| 5 |
> accelerator (written in assembly) no longer works with files over |
| 6 |
> 1GByte." |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Would comments in the ebuild not be enough? Look at the |
| 9 |
vmware-workstation-4.5.2 ebuild for an example. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I don't see why it would not be easy enough to comment the reasons an |
| 12 |
ebuild might not be marked stable. Another example that I can think of |
| 13 |
is the xorg-x11 ebuilds. You can see an obvious TODO list before it is |
| 14 |
considered stable. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 18 |
Release Engineering QA Manager/Games Developer |
| 19 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Is your power animal a penguin? |
Archives