| 1 |
On 10/07/17 12:43, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 |
> El lun, 10-07-2017 a las 13:12 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand escribió: |
| 3 |
>> On 07/10/2017 01:04 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Any issues on trying to go further into implementing this warning? |
| 5 |
>> Not an issue per se, but it should be pointed out that python 3.5 only |
| 6 |
>> has a testing visibility, so this at the very least requires maintainers |
| 7 |
>> to potentially have a separate testing chroot/VM to test when adding the |
| 8 |
>> compat. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> Yes, but it's similar as the cases when we need to fix our packages to work with |
| 11 |
> a newer library they depend on. In this case it would be even easier as we can |
| 12 |
> have multiple python versions and switch to the newer one for testing while |
| 13 |
> going back to the stable one (if preferred) later. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
Is this something that could be aided any by the tinderbox'ing project? |
Archives