| 1 |
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 09 June 2006 15:04, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 17:43 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Friday 09 June 2006 14:10, Roy Marples wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > Some packages provide both a client and a server. As such, users |
| 6 |
> > > > usually only want one or the other - and rarely both. |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > Thanks to wolf31o2 for pointing out that current policy dictates that we |
| 9 |
> > > install both by default and the minimal USE flag should be used to stop |
| 10 |
> > > server only compoment from installing. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Not policy (I don't think) but current accepted practice. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Should this become a policy? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> i dont think it should ... minimal has a very floating definition and varies |
| 17 |
> widely based on the package |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
See my RFC for how this is handled. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 23 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
| 24 |
x86 Architecture Team |
| 25 |
Games - Developer |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives