1 |
On Friday 09 June 2006 15:04, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 17:43 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: |
3 |
> > On Friday 09 June 2006 14:10, Roy Marples wrote: |
4 |
> > > Some packages provide both a client and a server. As such, users |
5 |
> > > usually only want one or the other - and rarely both. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Thanks to wolf31o2 for pointing out that current policy dictates that we |
8 |
> > install both by default and the minimal USE flag should be used to stop |
9 |
> > server only compoment from installing. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Not policy (I don't think) but current accepted practice. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Should this become a policy? |
14 |
|
15 |
i dont think it should ... minimal has a very floating definition and varies |
16 |
widely based on the package |
17 |
-mike |