| 1 |
Am 14.02.2013 17:30, schrieb Markos Chandras: |
| 2 |
> On 14 February 2013 15:57, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On 14/02/13 10:33 AM, George Shapovalov wrote: |
| 4 |
>>>> On Thursday 14 February 2013 21:03:55 Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>>> On 14 February 2013 20:25, George Shapovalov <george@g.o> |
| 6 |
>>>>> wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>>>> Um, what about the sunset overlay? IIRC, it was used/intended |
| 8 |
>>>>>> primarily for this purpose. Is it still alive? (haven't heard |
| 9 |
>>>>>> it mentioned in a while and layman seems to list onyl sunrise) |
| 10 |
>>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>>> You probably mean kde-sunset, which is specifically for |
| 12 |
>>>>> Qt3/KDE3. But I guess we could consider merging kde-sunset with |
| 13 |
>>>>> graveyard. |
| 14 |
>>>> Nope, plain sunset. At the time when the sunrise overlay was making |
| 15 |
>>>> a lot of noise (some 5 years ago?) there was a talk about sunset |
| 16 |
>>>> one. I don't remember details any more and it is absent from |
| 17 |
>>>> layman, so it could have been just talk without anything following |
| 18 |
>>>> it.. |
| 19 |
>>>> |
| 20 |
>>>> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I remember it too (and I think i mentioned it a couple of weeks ago). |
| 23 |
> I believe the sunset overlay was deprecated in favour of the attic |
| 24 |
> being made more easily available (also probably because no dev's had |
| 25 |
> time to maintain/administer it) |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Last time I checked, the sunrise overlay was very much alive. It's |
| 31 |
> purpose is not to store old ebuilds (per se). It keeps high-quality |
| 32 |
> (because they are reviewed by devs and users before they appear in the |
| 33 |
> main branch) ebuilds that are not in portage tree. I think that the |
| 34 |
> sunrise devs would reject ebuilds that got removed from tree for |
| 35 |
> obvious reasons (dead upstream, broken etc etc) |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Read again. It's sunset, not sunrise. :-) |
Archives