| 1 |
On Tuesday 27 December 2005 18:44, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> Can you prove it, for the "allow USE and version cycling" case? (Hint: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
O.k, let m treat you as a the hot potato that you're Ciaran: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
- We speak about ebuilds, which are installed and need to be reinstalled. |
| 7 |
There is no version cycling (or I do not get what you're after, please |
| 8 |
explain in that case). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
- Changed use flags will be processed by the normal dependency calculation of |
| 11 |
the ebuilds to be rebuilt which may lead to additional dependencies or |
| 12 |
blockers. It could also be that some ebuilds are installed, which do not |
| 13 |
exist in the repository anymore. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> you may find the PCP somewhat useful...) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
PCP - pretty colored potato? I don't know the abbreviation. Please explain it |
| 18 |
and whatelse I miss in your eyes. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Carsten |
Archives