Archives
Archives
| From: | Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Can't the Portage be an efficient guy? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 25 Nov 2010 22:42:52 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4CEEE5E5.309@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Can't the Portage be an efficient guy? by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On 11/22/10 02:59, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 | > In portage-2.1.9 there's a new --autounmask option. If you like it you |
| 3 | > can use EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS to enable it by default in make.conf. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Nice. in case I'm not the only one hearing of the --autounmask |
| 6 | parameter the first time, that may indicate it could use more publicity. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Can I get you to blog about it (with an example) on Planet Gentoo? |
| 9 | Anyone else volunteering? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Best, |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Sebastian |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Can't the Portage be an efficient guy? | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> |