| 1 |
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 05:59:25PM +0200, Sven K?hler wrote: |
| 2 |
> >I don't know; I don't use RHL or RHEL. However, I suspect they work just |
| 3 |
> >as Gentoo does. init(8) first signals the processes in its process group, |
| 4 |
> >so you'll see: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> >INIT: Switching to runlevel 0 |
| 7 |
> >INIT: Sending processes the TERM signal |
| 8 |
> >INIT: Sending processes the KILL signal |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> >on the console. Then init runs the RHL shutdown scripts, the final one of |
| 11 |
> >which probably sends all processes SIGTERM and SIGKILL, just like Gentoo's |
| 12 |
> >/etc/init.d/halt.sh does. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> No, you first see the init-scripts shutting down all the services, and |
| 15 |
> than you see the TERM/KILL stuff. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
*shrug* Maybe they kludged init so they wouldn't get support calls asking |
| 18 |
why processes were being killed before the shutdown scripts ran. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The point is that there's nothing technically wrong with the way Gentoo |
| 21 |
does it now. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives