1 |
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 12:25, splite-gentoo@××××××××××××××××.edu wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 05:59:25PM +0200, Sven K?hler wrote: |
3 |
> > >I don't know; I don't use RHL or RHEL. However, I suspect they work just |
4 |
> > >as Gentoo does. init(8) first signals the processes in its process group, |
5 |
> > >so you'll see: |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > >INIT: Switching to runlevel 0 |
8 |
> > >INIT: Sending processes the TERM signal |
9 |
> > >INIT: Sending processes the KILL signal |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > >on the console. Then init runs the RHL shutdown scripts, the final one of |
12 |
> > >which probably sends all processes SIGTERM and SIGKILL, just like Gentoo's |
13 |
> > >/etc/init.d/halt.sh does. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > No, you first see the init-scripts shutting down all the services, and |
16 |
> > than you see the TERM/KILL stuff. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> *shrug* Maybe they kludged init so they wouldn't get support calls asking |
19 |
> why processes were being killed before the shutdown scripts ran. |
20 |
|
21 |
It is patched out. I used to do the same thing with Slackware/LFS boxes |
22 |
simply because it made for fewer questions from users. You can always |
23 |
grab the .src.rpm and look at what patches they use yourself. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Chris Gianelloni |
27 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
28 |
Games Team |
29 |
|
30 |
Is your power animal a pengiun? |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |