1 |
Brett I. Holcomb wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>On Sat, 8 May 2004, John David Ratliff wrote: |
4 |
>Check the docs on the Gentoo site for nameing convention. I ran into this |
5 |
>on an ebuild - currently emerge can't handle some of the names that are |
6 |
>used. As long as the various ${P} ${PN} variables get set correctly in |
7 |
>the ebuild you and change the name as you suggest. Whether or not it |
8 |
>works depends on how the source you're getting it from stores it. I had |
9 |
>one where the source needed the extra version info to retrieve it properly |
10 |
>but portage wouldn't handle it |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
Yes. I missed the word integer before. It doesn't seem there is anyway |
14 |
to specify this revision 1 except in -r1, which seems reserved for |
15 |
Gentoo Linux specifics. I will just drop the r1 I suppose. |
16 |
|
17 |
John Ratliff |
18 |
|
19 |
> |
20 |
> > Brett I. Holcomb |
21 |
>wrote: > |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
>>>To just create an ebuild you don't need to check out the portage tree. |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>>> |
27 |
>>> |
28 |
>>> |
29 |
>>> |
30 |
>>Thanks. This is mostly what I have done. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>>Another question. What is wrong with this name for an ebuild |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>>tigcc-0.95_beta8r1.ebuild |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>>The version is 0.95 beta 8r1 (This is what they call it). |
37 |
>> |
38 |
>>Remove the r1, and there are no problems. Should I just change it to |
39 |
>>maybe tigcc-0.95_beta8.ebuild |
40 |
>> |
41 |
>>Thanks... |
42 |
>> |
43 |
>> |
44 |
>> |
45 |
>>>On Sat, 8 May 2004, John David Ratliff wrote: |
46 |
>>> |
47 |
>>> |
48 |
>>> |
49 |
>>> |
50 |
>>> |
51 |
>>>>I want to create an ebuild for a software package, but I am confused on |
52 |
>>>>the directions. The ebuild HOWTO tells me to checkout portage from CVS, |
53 |
>>>>however, it lists no CVS server or what kind of authentication to use. |
54 |
>>>>Is this restricted to 'official' developers? If so, can I still create |
55 |
>>>>and submit an ebuild? If not, what is the CVSROOT setting so I can |
56 |
>>>>checkout portage? |
57 |
>>>> |
58 |
>>>>I also need to add the software to the gentoo mirrors. I read in one of |
59 |
>>>>the HOWTOs that cvs snapshots could be added to the mirror. This is |
60 |
>>>>similar, except they use the same filename for every new version, so |
61 |
>>>>there is no way to know which version you are downloading from their |
62 |
>>>>site. Additionally, each new version requires different a specific |
63 |
>>>>version of another package to be downloaded, so it is crucial that the |
64 |
>>>>version of the original package is known. So I thought maybe I could add |
65 |
>>>>this with a version number to the gentoo mirror. |
66 |
>>>> |
67 |
>>>>Finally, I am unsure where in portage it should be added. It is a |
68 |
>>>>cross-compiler for C into native binaries for a specific kind of |
69 |
>>>>calculator. The software is a modified version of GCC and binutils. |
70 |
>>>> |
71 |
>>>>Thanks... |
72 |
>>>> |
73 |
>>>> |
74 |
>>>>-- |
75 |
>>>>gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
76 |
>>>> |
77 |
>>>> |
78 |
>>>> |
79 |
>>>> |
80 |
>>>> |
81 |
>>> |
82 |
>>> |
83 |
>>> |
84 |
>>> |
85 |
>>-- |
86 |
>>gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
87 |
>> |
88 |
>> |
89 |
>> |
90 |
> |
91 |
> |
92 |
> |
93 |
|
94 |
|
95 |
-- |
96 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |