| 1 |
On Monday 20 October 2003 13:16, Luke-Jr wrote: |
| 2 |
> I was thinking that once 2.6.0 was final, the kernel people would |
| 3 |
> (hopefully) release a gentoo-sources using 2.6 in unstable... If this is |
| 4 |
> not the case, would anyone mind if love-sources were to be added to the |
| 5 |
> portage tree or is there any reason not to? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
love-sources is the work of two people who both have fairly little time to |
| 8 |
devote to the numerous bug reports coming from the relatively small number of |
| 9 |
users using it. If it were added to portage (even if it was masked in |
| 10 |
packages.mask) the number of bug reports would be ridiculous. I suggest that |
| 11 |
it should not be added unless it becomes more than just a hobby for the |
| 12 |
maintainers. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Regards, |
| 15 |
Jason |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives