Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: Brandon Hale <tseng@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 04:16:21
Message-Id: 200310200416.14653.luke-jr@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move by Brandon Hale
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Monday 20 October 2003 03:20 am, Brandon Hale wrote:
5 > It appears that the larger part of our user base is running a 2.4 series
6 > kernel, and will be for quite some time. Considering this, and our position
7 > that testing kernels are not offically supported, I think we should give
8 > priority to fixing bugs that affect the most users.
9 I was thinking that once 2.6.0 was final, the kernel people would (hopefully)
10 release a gentoo-sources using 2.6 in unstable... If this is not the case,
11 would anyone mind if love-sources were to be added to the portage tree or is
12 there any reason not to?
13 - --
14 Luke-Jr
15 Developer, Gentoo Linux
16 http://www.gentoo.org/
17 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
18 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
19
20 iD8DBQE/k2GMZl/BHdU+lYMRAow0AJ4qOy2QdLiSGBAHK/MbNw0qm1on4wCdG5lS
21 vDFXTcyyDWNgYx2LJ2EaxPM=
22 =1x5y
23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
24
25
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move Jason Stubbs <jasonbstubbs@×××××××××××.com>