From: | "Alin Năstac" <mrness@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV} | ||
Date: | Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:19:37 | ||
Message-Id: | 49C6D58E.4070604@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV} by Ryan Hill |
1 | On 3/22/09 11:47 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
2 | > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:50:26 +0100 |
3 | > Alin Năstac <mrness@g.o> wrote: |
4 | > |
5 | > |
6 | >> Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild |
7 | >> versions than ${PV}. |
8 | >> Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? |
9 | >> |
10 | > |
11 | > Um, why? |
12 | > |
13 | > I'm not having six identical patches with different version numbers in |
14 | > FILESDIR. |
15 | > |
16 | > |
17 | Fine, then remove $PV from patch name and use it in any ebuild version |
18 | you want. Or just decouple the patch version from the ebuild version |
19 | (foo-bar-r1.patch sounds OK to me). |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV} | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV} | Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> |