Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:41:41
Message-Id: 20090322184223.5456844c@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV} by "Alin Năstac"
1 On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:19:26 +0100
2 Alin Năstac <mrness@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Fine, then remove $PV from patch name and use it in any ebuild version
5 > you want. Or just decouple the patch version from the ebuild version
6 > (foo-bar-r1.patch sounds OK to me).
7
8 No. It's done this way for a reason.
9
10 --
11 gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
12 treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
13 wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies