Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing GLEP-62 itself
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:15:21
Message-Id: 5064B374.2090205@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing GLEP-62 itself by Brian Harring
1 On 09/27/2012 12:53 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
2 > Bullshit. This is optional in the sense of embrace/extend 'optional';
3 > if one PM takes up the new functionality, all have to switch to
4 > writing unfinalized deps to the VDB, and all have to switch to
5 > transfering that IUSE_RUNTIME crap to the VDB.
6
7 I think the proposal suddenly becomes a lot saner if it's done as an
8 EAPI extension, the optional runtime deps and IUSE_RUNTIME conditionals
9 are isolated in a new separate variable (perhaps SRDEPEND), and
10 IUSE_RUNTIME is not allowed to intersect with IUSE. Using a separate
11 SRDEPEND variable means that the package manager only has to preserve
12 USE conditionals in the vdb for that one variable.
13 --
14 Thanks,
15 Zac

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing GLEP-62 itself Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>