Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing GLEP-62 itself
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:31:56
Message-Id: 5064B74A.6050103@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing GLEP-62 itself by Zac Medico
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 27/09/12 04:13 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
5 > On 09/27/2012 12:53 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
6 >> Bullshit. This is optional in the sense of embrace/extend
7 >> 'optional'; if one PM takes up the new functionality, all have to
8 >> switch to writing unfinalized deps to the VDB, and all have to
9 >> switch to transfering that IUSE_RUNTIME crap to the VDB.
10 >
11 > I think the proposal suddenly becomes a lot saner if it's done as
12 > an EAPI extension, the optional runtime deps and IUSE_RUNTIME
13 > conditionals are isolated in a new separate variable (perhaps
14 > SRDEPEND), and IUSE_RUNTIME is not allowed to intersect with IUSE.
15 > Using a separate SRDEPEND variable means that the package manager
16 > only has to preserve USE conditionals in the vdb for that one
17 > variable.
18
19
20 Saner, perhaps, but that would also mean the feature would be more or
21 less independent of the current USE handling within the PM.
22
23 Mind you if it's easier to deal with in the PM then I guess
24 piggy-backing on the current USE implementation isn't an advantage.
25
26 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
27 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
28
29 iF4EAREIAAYFAlBkt0oACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAKtQEAgkIJJfyBV20VsKVL8/dPlKF9
30 B4+SnJGlA+daYTCjXvgA/jq7aNzN8Cuj/sE+S+VWCK5U50vtHX3CqhoeOitgf9Zl
31 =G5Tc
32 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing GLEP-62 itself Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>