Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more hardening features to default? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:57:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201110200857.00687.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more hardening features to default? by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On Thursday 20 October 2011 08:41:55 Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 | > 2011/10/20 Tomáš Chvátal: |
| 3 | > > I would say that most hardened features should be merged to to main |
| 4 | > > profile as soon as they won't cause major PITA for the regular users. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > I agree - especially for stuff that doesn't require active setup |
| 7 | > (stack protection, PaX, etc). |
| 8 | |
| 9 | except PaX requires kernel patches and is known to break things. not an |
| 10 | acceptable default. |
| 11 | -mike |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more hardening features to default? | "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> |