| 1 |
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:50:18AM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: |
| 2 |
> I feel really confused. Have you read the logs of the recent affair? |
| 3 |
> Devrel *hadn't* requested anything, infra made an action on their own |
| 4 |
> and *didn't* revert it even after being told by devrel that no action |
| 5 |
> was requested. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
And then there was much discussion and it was largely resolved |
| 8 |
between the two projects, so I don't see how it's relevant to what I |
| 9 |
said. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Sure infra has to pick up the pieces, that's their job. If they don't |
| 13 |
> like it and think that $someone is about to screw up something while |
| 14 |
> devrel doesn't think so and devrel don't change their mind after a talk |
| 15 |
> with infra, even then infra should have *no power* to suspend the dev in |
| 16 |
> question. At least that's how I see the infra's role as I already stated |
| 17 |
> several times on -core. Politics != system administration. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I said when devrel breaks, not when infra and devrel disagree. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I can't comment on the most recent issue, I had no involvement, have no |
| 23 |
opinion, and don't feel like getting into a mailing list war over |
| 24 |
something that's already been resolved even if I did -- including |
| 25 |
current devrel/infra relations since it's no longer considered part of |
| 26 |
the proposed code of conduct :) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 30 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives