| 1 |
Am Montag, 18. September 2017, 14:28:37 CEST schrieb M. J. Everitt: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> <snip> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Would a virtual help any? Probably overlooking a good number of factors, |
| 6 |
> but wasn't mentioned yet ... |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
So far I don't see how... Virtual would mean that the same functionality is |
| 10 |
provided by different packages, and that they can be exchanged at runtime. |
| 11 |
However, for rpc there are different library *names* (sonames) to be linked, |
| 12 |
and for nls the soversion is different... Even if the headers were identical, |
| 13 |
that wouldnt work :/ |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 17 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives