1 |
If I may ask, isn't usage by 27 packages ample grounds on its own to make |
2 |
it a global use flag? |
3 |
|
4 |
This is one of the questions I noticed on the ebuild quiz, and there the |
5 |
ballpark is around 5 packages sharing a use flag. we're way over that mark. |
6 |
|
7 |
my two cents. |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
11 |
|
12 |
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:28:41 +0200 |
13 |
> Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > On 20/02/14 18:27, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
17 |
> > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:26:18 +0200 |
18 |
> > > Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
19 |
> > > |
20 |
> > >> On 20/02/14 10:47, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: |
21 |
> > >>> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 10:40 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
22 |
> > >>>> On 20/02/14 09:44, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: |
23 |
> > >>>>> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 07:55 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
24 |
> > >>>>>> On 20/02/14 00:23, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
25 |
> > >>>>>>> Following up to today's QA meeting: The gtk3 USE flag is used |
26 |
> > >>>>>>> by 27 packages, so I suggest making it a global flag: |
27 |
> > >>>>>>> |
28 |
> > >>>>>>> gtk3 - Add support for x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit) |
29 |
> > >>>>>>> version 3 |
30 |
> > >>>>>>> |
31 |
> > >>>>>>> Ulrich |
32 |
> > >>>>>> that would suggest it's fine to use, and is anything but |
33 |
> > >>>>>> temporary |
34 |
> > >>>>>> |
35 |
> > >>>>>> -1 from here |
36 |
> > >>>>>> |
37 |
> > >>>>> MATE desktop (which I hope to bring in to Portage soon) can be |
38 |
> > >>>>> built against gtk+ 2 or gtk+ 3, and upstream supports doing |
39 |
> > >>>>> both, so +1 from me. Just because gtk+ 3 is the latest, does |
40 |
> > >>>>> not mean it's the greatest, and I really wish people would |
41 |
> > >>>>> realize that newest != bestest. |
42 |
> > >>>>> |
43 |
> > >>>>> |
44 |
> > >>>> Then you pick whatever is best supported for MATE, and ship it |
45 |
> > >>>> using that. Later when they have completed their support for |
46 |
> > >>>> GTK+-3, and it's the best supported, you ship that. It's not |
47 |
> > >>>> rocket science. |
48 |
> > >>>> |
49 |
> > >>> OR, since I'm the maintainer, I decide that I'm willing to deal |
50 |
> > >>> with both, instead of you telling me that I need to pick one or |
51 |
> > >>> the other. Upstream says both are supported and viable, and I'm |
52 |
> > >>> willing to deal with the headaches. Just because you're |
53 |
> > >>> unwilling doesn't mean others aren't. kthx. |
54 |
> > >>> |
55 |
> > >>> |
56 |
> > >> Bye bye distribution level consistency :-( |
57 |
> > >> |
58 |
> > >> It's sad that few stubborn developers can do that. |
59 |
> > >> |
60 |
> > >> - Samuli |
61 |
> > >> |
62 |
> > > "'Ey! Have you heard about it. Gentoo doesn't provide X with support |
63 |
> > > for Y, then what are their USE flags even for; what a shame, ..." |
64 |
> > > |
65 |
> > > If people want to support and use multiple things, let them do so. |
66 |
> > > It is pretty much what Gentoo and its philosophy are about; which |
67 |
> > > somewhat can be summarized as providing choices such that we fit |
68 |
> > > the users' need, and not force our one true way upon them... |
69 |
> > > |
70 |
> > > Greetings from someone who runs GNOME 3 and MATE simultaneously; |
71 |
> > > you can intentionally break it, but why would you? It takes away |
72 |
> > > our happiness. On the other hand, there's the part where you want |
73 |
> > > to break it for a reason, perhaps for your happiness; but then I'd |
74 |
> > > like to hear why. |
75 |
> > > |
76 |
> > |
77 |
> > So, no more setting USE="gtk" and assuming the best packaged software |
78 |
> > will be get installed, be it with what version of the toolkit, 1, 2 |
79 |
> > or 3 |
80 |
> |
81 |
> What is "best"? What you would deem best, could be worst for the user. |
82 |
> |
83 |
> > Instead, now you have to selectively do the maintainers job for |
84 |
> > figuring out which one is the best supported one |
85 |
> |
86 |
> The maintainer can use IUSE flag defaults for this; but, there are |
87 |
> users that want to control which toolkit is installed. Going further, |
88 |
> they want to decide which toolkit the software is built with. |
89 |
> |
90 |
> > Despite already picking up a modern theme with both GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ |
91 |
> > 3.x looks, now you might end up with half-crippled software just |
92 |
> > because some stubborn people choose the looks, not the functionality, |
93 |
> > to be their motivation |
94 |
> |
95 |
> You need to mask that as a packager. |
96 |
> |
97 |
> > Such people really don't deserve to own a packager status if they |
98 |
> > can't take the time to determine / examine the package's best |
99 |
> > supported graphical toolkit |
100 |
> |
101 |
> What is "best"? If upstream provides both and claims they both are |
102 |
> well supported, I consider both are. |
103 |
> |
104 |
> > If multiple ones with similar feature set is supported, then the |
105 |
> > latest toolkit is preferred |
106 |
> |
107 |
> What is "preferred"? What you prefer can be different than the user. |
108 |
> |
109 |
> > But seems like I'm repeating common sense which the GNOME guideline |
110 |
> > layed out long ago |
111 |
> |
112 |
> The GNOME guideline fits just the GNOME team and developers whom follow |
113 |
> that; however, in the bigger picture, there are maintainers that do not |
114 |
> follow that and do something different. Looking at the tracker [1]; it |
115 |
> appears that it is more common for such a bug to be marked as INVALID |
116 |
> or WONTFIX, than it is to be marked as FIXED. |
117 |
> |
118 |
> As a result of this, the users get an inconsistent USE flag presented. |
119 |
> |
120 |
> The "common sense" is just another wording of "opinion" here; if it |
121 |
> wants to be real "common sense" shared amongst almost everyone, it'll |
122 |
> need a bit more than a guideline. |
123 |
> |
124 |
> [1]: |
125 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL%20blocked%3A420493 |
126 |
> |
127 |
> -- |
128 |
> With kind regards, |
129 |
> |
130 |
> Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
131 |
> Gentoo Developer |
132 |
> |
133 |
> E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
134 |
> GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
135 |
> GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
136 |
> |
137 |
> |