| 1 |
19.11.2005, 5:30:35, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> Testing ebuilds when keywording/marking stable is supposed to be |
| 4 |
>> mandatory and such stuff does not belong into changelogs. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Sorry, but that's a big no. People that add/remove keywords without |
| 7 |
> making note in the Changelog deserve a massive kick in the nuts. I'm |
| 8 |
> not sure if you have been paying attention to Changelogs, but all of the |
| 9 |
> sane arches have and will continue to make such entries. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> -Steve |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Grrrmhhh, was it so much unclear? I mean: "stable on x86" definitely belongs to |
| 14 |
changelogs, while "stable on x86, thanks Jim for opening a keywording bug, Jack |
| 15 |
and Jim for testing and Joe for reminding me five times to mark it finally |
| 16 |
stable when I forgot about it" does NOT. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It's the responsibility of the developer who keyworded the thing anyway, ATs |
| 19 |
are not allowed to keyword stuff and don't have RW CVS access, so what is the |
| 20 |
purpose of tracking such stuff in changelogs and cluttering them? Use CVS |
| 21 |
commit messages to track such things if you think you need it. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
jakub |
Archives