| 1 |
Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:00 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>>sys-storage: or move stuff to sys-fs? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>If we go how sys-fs looks now, mdadm should go to sys-fs as well, as |
| 12 |
>raidtools, lvm, evms, etc are there already. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
But these are not really file systems per say, I would say more |
| 17 |
sys-block or sys-rbm (random block management) or sys-blockdev ... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
>Also, some things are a bit vague, like hdparm might rather go to |
| 20 |
>sys-hardware. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
sys-block |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
>A thought might be to move all these (except hdparm, etc), as well as |
| 26 |
>sys-fs to sys-storage rather. If we really go by sys-fs means to me at |
| 27 |
>least, it probably should only be the fsck's, and devfs/udev that stay |
| 28 |
>there if any. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
devfs/udev are in fact pseudofs ... so they could be splitted in the |
| 33 |
future if ever needed... |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Phil |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives