| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Unless there are Tcl-specific features for an app, why depend on it at all? Tk |
| 5 |
depends on Tcl, that's fine. Let Tk's dependency pull it in. Why do Tk-based |
| 6 |
programs need to be aware of what Tk depends on? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
On Sunday 17 August 2003 08:08 am, Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
| 9 |
> This has come up before, and I still wish to voice against it. Like I |
| 10 |
> said to Mike (vapier/spanky) in a previous post, and what msterret and I |
| 11 |
> are working on fixing through the tree is: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> tcltk? ( X? ( blah ) ) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> which is more accurate. By separating them you run into this error |
| 16 |
> case: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> USE="-tcl tk" |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> except that tk needs tcl. And once upon a time they actually were |
| 21 |
> separate. I put them together because every ebuild that had a tk dep in |
| 22 |
> it was doing: |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> tcl? ( tcl ) tk? ( tk ) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> which is just silly really. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> My 2 cents, |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
- -- |
| 31 |
Luke-Jr |
| 32 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 33 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 34 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 35 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
iD8DBQE/P4fMZl/BHdU+lYMRAiReAJ0QXftG0tEcgjNuHNmkDQrhQuShrQCeN8YO |
| 38 |
DGkQ8lpQjTYkyPiHsrJuL0g= |
| 39 |
=Iy+F |
| 40 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives