| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 06/12/2013 01:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:05:29 +0200 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> Isn't it more an indication that Gentoo needs better package |
| 8 |
>>> management support for overlays? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> No. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> You make a persuasive argument. I realise now that the Summer of |
| 13 |
> Code projects for this were a mistake. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
We need worse support for overlays, i.e. no. Having to use >3 overlays |
| 18 |
defeats the purpose of a QA'd tree. Everything in an (official) |
| 19 |
overlay should be in package.mask instead. The main reason it isn't is |
| 20 |
because nobody wants to use CVS. For good examples, see sunrise or |
| 21 |
gentoo-haskell. |
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRuK54AAoJEBxJck0inpOiHCsP/ivXsWF4GMYNkzNTCYLUmTZI |
| 26 |
hXXuF2ZEx6c1nlml/BXNtmABFcE6IO6GthLqLW7P6lmVyxy9E5jtDXD6Hht2H05K |
| 27 |
JLP57LO9dUjHZDeZeElkQDhZ1BHWFhTA0wAvzZqodGtjUiuxDFvp58E8iVvnnqw+ |
| 28 |
b852Y5bSh1hNPeb6c/P/tcRekOrz8k98LBlJny+rmw6AlRZLcieeKcTe5XPhRD6s |
| 29 |
QE79saIDThrqRn2fvkgdSMYJ0XR3FfkFWDeRopcilIJwm6+gjmkzGmXjBFkjG0g5 |
| 30 |
ImpeCtjL/0m/2gjUhKcJIYCNYxM/TD8K0MFRUpXLPX6jd76U1IL77UmTWMNz2r7m |
| 31 |
2Rlr8gkvn9Iutlw1mhcLjYe6gaypfnDDv7rPZiJlLbSMY9XLwB3tLwatUzbEveBw |
| 32 |
Bn0AliHppphdA7cs50C7DlAw6cLTZKsdGlqTQJWaMxNHyXftYRQb65zD1AhfMawr |
| 33 |
/1XQ97cUHtozySdPMHaQVwrm0I7FxUtuV1z3x484gEgvn184u3XLnJIxRB8+ykhP |
| 34 |
vM/Az7GmGqNzDUeOFBKi1GHjQRlniMZPCOv43/QaKrN6t1Sjnrl68zuYEW5ujf/g |
| 35 |
tPUnLnVWl8vRQ6PZYE4OfipT9ovaTJFivRpXHWER6FTIIeBoypWfIYCnV5hNCOUL |
| 36 |
t6uIkp0UbYWl2RAL+ZIM |
| 37 |
=tHMl |
| 38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives