Archives
Archives
| From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: persistence of eclasses for installed packages | ||
| Date: | Sat, 04 Nov 2006 11:17:41 | ||
| Message-Id: | 454C7625.4070805@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] RFC: persistence of eclasses for installed packages by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | Zac Medico kirjoitti: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > What do people think about these two approaches? Personally, I |
| 4 | > would prefer approach #2 for the sake of simplicity and |
| 5 | > maintainability. The sooner that we start storing eclasses.tbz2 for |
| 6 | > each installed package, the sooner that we will be able to have more |
| 7 | > freedom with the eclasses in the live portage tree. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | One thing that comes to mind is that how do we handle the case where the |
| 10 | old version of the eclass has a major bug in pkg_postrm for example. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Regards, |
| 13 | Petteri |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: persistence of eclasses for installed packages | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: persistence of eclasses for installed packages | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |