| 1 |
On Saturday 04 November 2006 06:14, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> Zac Medico kirjoitti: |
| 3 |
> > What do people think about these two approaches? Personally, I |
| 4 |
> > would prefer approach #2 for the sake of simplicity and |
| 5 |
> > maintainability. The sooner that we start storing eclasses.tbz2 for |
| 6 |
> > each installed package, the sooner that we will be able to have more |
| 7 |
> > freedom with the eclasses in the live portage tree. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> One thing that comes to mind is that how do we handle the case where the |
| 10 |
> old version of the eclass has a major bug in pkg_postrm for example. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
that would be the only thing keeping me from saying LETS DO #2 NOW ;) |
| 13 |
-mike |
Archives