Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:52:54
Message-Id: 20050628104851.GA6903@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project by "Fernando J. Pereda"
1 On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:28:20PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
2 > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:19:34PM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
3 > > > I still don't see *WHY* you should be different from us. If you want to
4 > > > manage your recruits then they can't be gentoo staff.
5 > >
6 > > One reason could be that we are _not_ going to be called developers but staff.
7 >
8 > Can anybody explain me the difference between them ?
9 >
10 > > > Arch teams have developed a new 'figure', the arch tester. Not official
11 > > > gentoo staff but somehow involved with us; arch teams manage their own
12 > > > arch tester recruitment process. If that's the situation you want then
13 > > > they won't become gentoo staff.
14 > >
15 > > Didn't I say that was already agreed with devrel?
16 >
17 > Do I have to quit saying that I think that's wrong? No thanks. You are
18 > the only group that will make new devs apart from devrel. I still don't
19 > see why you should deserve a different treatment.
20 >
21
22
23 AFAIK they still plan to go through devrel, just add a forums person to
24 the recruiters team so existing recruiters aren't flooded with new staff
25 all of a sudden
26
27
28 --
29 Jon Portnoy
30 avenj/irc.freenode.net
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies