| 1 |
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:48:51AM -0400, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:28:20PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:19:34PM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > > I still don't see *WHY* you should be different from us. If you want to |
| 5 |
> > > > manage your recruits then they can't be gentoo staff. |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > One reason could be that we are _not_ going to be called developers but staff. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Can anybody explain me the difference between them ? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > > > Arch teams have developed a new 'figure', the arch tester. Not official |
| 12 |
> > > > gentoo staff but somehow involved with us; arch teams manage their own |
| 13 |
> > > > arch tester recruitment process. If that's the situation you want then |
| 14 |
> > > > they won't become gentoo staff. |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > > Didn't I say that was already agreed with devrel? |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Do I have to quit saying that I think that's wrong? No thanks. You are |
| 19 |
> > the only group that will make new devs apart from devrel. I still don't |
| 20 |
> > see why you should deserve a different treatment. |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> AFAIK they still plan to go through devrel, just add a forums person to |
| 25 |
> the recruiters team so existing recruiters aren't flooded with new staff |
| 26 |
> all of a sudden |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
OK, I take that back, plans were dropped for a forums-specific recruiter |
| 29 |
and instead it'd all go through the existing recruiters |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Either way, my point stands 8) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 35 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives