Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Gentoo vmware/virtualbox/qemu images
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:01:18
Message-Id: fd3rbm$l2$2@sea.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo vmware/virtualbox/qemu images by Chris Gianelloni
1 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
2
3 > On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 07:19 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
4 >> This guy: http://gentoovm.blogspot.com/ works for vmware according to his
5 >> first post here: http://www.vmwhere.net/category/gentoo/ (where he makes
6 >> clear he has nothing to do with releng, and that his work is in no way to
7 >> be seen as official.) He might be a good guy to rope in? He seems to be
8 >> having trouble with hosting and hasn't released since 2006.0 so he'd most
9 >> likely welcome the approach, imo.
10 >
11 > He was on the bug. Also, people seem to forget that we would also very
12 > likely have an issue with hosting, too. We do not have unlimited space
13 > on our community-donated mirrors.
14 Yeah I hear that a lot from gentoo devs on irc. Funny thing is, whenever I
15 turn around and say "Oh there was someone the other day asking whether they
16 could donate CPU time and bandwidth," they suddenly lose all interest. I
17 have no idea why.
18
19 People don't feel good about donating to an email address.
20
21 > It has always been a constant
22 > struggle within Release Engineering to keep our sizes down. This is one
23 > of the reasons that we've not undertaken such a task. To be honest,
24 > once I get support in catalyst, it'll be much more likely that I'll end
25 > up creating these, since I'll be able to share the catalyst caches and
26 > such between LiveDVD and VM image builds, so it'll take almost no time
27 > to produce the builds.
28 >
29 So is it the time or the hosting requirement that's the overwhelming factor?
30 As users are clearly happy to step up and fill in the gaps (as that page
31 and the bug show.)
32
33
34 --
35 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list