1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 07:19 +0100, Steve Long wrote: |
4 |
>> This guy: http://gentoovm.blogspot.com/ works for vmware according to his |
5 |
>> first post here: http://www.vmwhere.net/category/gentoo/ (where he makes |
6 |
>> clear he has nothing to do with releng, and that his work is in no way to |
7 |
>> be seen as official.) He might be a good guy to rope in? He seems to be |
8 |
>> having trouble with hosting and hasn't released since 2006.0 so he'd most |
9 |
>> likely welcome the approach, imo. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> He was on the bug. Also, people seem to forget that we would also very |
12 |
> likely have an issue with hosting, too. We do not have unlimited space |
13 |
> on our community-donated mirrors. |
14 |
Yeah I hear that a lot from gentoo devs on irc. Funny thing is, whenever I |
15 |
turn around and say "Oh there was someone the other day asking whether they |
16 |
could donate CPU time and bandwidth," they suddenly lose all interest. I |
17 |
have no idea why. |
18 |
|
19 |
People don't feel good about donating to an email address. |
20 |
|
21 |
> It has always been a constant |
22 |
> struggle within Release Engineering to keep our sizes down. This is one |
23 |
> of the reasons that we've not undertaken such a task. To be honest, |
24 |
> once I get support in catalyst, it'll be much more likely that I'll end |
25 |
> up creating these, since I'll be able to share the catalyst caches and |
26 |
> such between LiveDVD and VM image builds, so it'll take almost no time |
27 |
> to produce the builds. |
28 |
> |
29 |
So is it the time or the hosting requirement that's the overwhelming factor? |
30 |
As users are clearly happy to step up and fill in the gaps (as that page |
31 |
and the bug show.) |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |