| 1 |
Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 28 December 2005 17:26, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>I just picked some package as an example of the output with |
| 5 |
>>openoffice-bin. My understanding here is that if you link against those |
| 6 |
>>libraries, it will break break binary packages because dependencies |
| 7 |
>>don't say to pull in required libraries. This just means that apr-util |
| 8 |
>>should be fixed. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> By the way, you might want to check the locations of libraries. Openoffice-bin |
| 13 |
> does not satisfy the dependency for the db library. It namely is outside the |
| 14 |
> library search path (and it should be). You might want to use ld.so.conf with |
| 15 |
> the rpath attribute of the binary to determine which libraries to consider. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Working on it with solar. I just put the || in there until I have |
| 19 |
something better. Thinking about libstdc++-v3 having all the |
| 20 |
alternatives is also useful. Developers should know that the one from |
| 21 |
openoffice is not used. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Regards, |
| 24 |
Petteri |
Archives