| 1 |
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 01:16:54PM +0200, Andrew Ammerlaan wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi Chris, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I think @Alessandro (CC) has already done some work on this over at [1]. |
| 5 |
> I'm not sure what the status of it is though. Maybe you two can discuss |
| 6 |
> this together to avoid doing double work. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
There's been others too, e.g. |
| 9 |
https://git.sr.ht/~dblsaiko/ebuilds/tree/master/item/eclass/npm2x.eclass |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Haven't needed npm stuff myself but I was keeping looking at that |
| 12 |
one in mind if I ever needed to. Albeit at this point I'd likely |
| 13 |
not want the giant manifest+variables required for these without |
| 14 |
a vendor tarball. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Best regards, |
| 18 |
> Andrew |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> [1] https://github.com/Alessandro-Barbieri/node-overlay |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> On 05/06/2022 07:47, Chris Pritchard wrote: |
| 23 |
> > Hello, |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > Would there be any interest in a yarn / NPM eclass that supports offline |
| 26 |
> > installs. For a personal overlay I’ve got a working yarn.eclass |
| 27 |
> > (https://github.com/chriscpritchard/overseerr-overlay/blob/main/eclass/yarn.eclass |
| 28 |
> > <https://github.com/chriscpritchard/overseerr-overlay/blob/main/eclass/yarn.eclass>) |
| 29 |
> > and I’ve been able to make a version that supports npm from |
| 30 |
> > NPM-Shrinkwrap or npm-lock.json files (this is still being tested). |
| 31 |
> > |
| 32 |
> > If there is an interest, would anyone be willing to support me in having |
| 33 |
> > an eclass added to the tree? |
| 34 |
> > |
| 35 |
> > Thanks, |
| 36 |
> > |
| 37 |
> > Chris |
| 38 |
> > |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
ionen |
Archives