Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Pre-GLEP: Security Project
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:38:31
Message-Id: 3f4b97e8-af19-8a87-0ee7-eeaa9131b15e@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Pre-GLEP: Security Project by Kristian Fiskerstrand
1 On 2017-03-12 19:35, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
2 >> Why do Security Project members need to be ebuild devs?
3 >> Non ebuild developers can contribute by producing GLSAs,
4 >> for example.
5 >
6 > Where is that requirement stated?
7
8 I agree with Roy. That's also my reading of
9
10 > * The applicant must have successfully completed the Gentoo Developer quiz.
11
12 I agree with that requirement for a full membership (nobody would share
13 not yet disclosed vulnerabilities with us if he/she can't be sure that
14 people who will get this information aren't part of the project. I.e.
15 people will assume that these people have agreed on the same things
16 which is part of the process).
17
18 My answer for people who aren't devs yet but want to help: Feel free to
19 help! There are so many ways to help/contribute. If your motivation is
20 just a badge your are wrong for the project.
21
22 However, this doesn't belong into a GLEP.
23
24
25 --
26 Regards,
27 Thomas

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Pre-GLEP: Security Project Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>