| 1 |
On 03/13/2017 08:38 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2017-03-12 19:35, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> Why do Security Project members need to be ebuild devs? |
| 4 |
>>> Non ebuild developers can contribute by producing GLSAs, |
| 5 |
>>> for example. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Where is that requirement stated? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I agree with Roy. That's also my reading of |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> * The applicant must have successfully completed the Gentoo Developer quiz. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I agree with that requirement for a full membership (nobody would share |
| 14 |
> not yet disclosed vulnerabilities with us if he/she can't be sure that |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
now I'm even more lost. Gentoo Developer quiz does not imply ebuild |
| 17 |
repository access, we have current developers in the project without |
| 18 |
tree access and they are doing an outstanding job, so depending on the |
| 19 |
definition of "full membership" .... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 24 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 25 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives