Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk1 vs. gtk2
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:59:00
Message-Id: 44D7A858.8070306@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk1 vs. gtk2 by Enrico Weigelt
1 Enrico Weigelt wrote:
2 >> If we changed the name of a package every time there was an API break,
3 >> we would literally have thousands of packages in the tree that essentially
4 >> do the same thing, just with different API's.
5 >
6 > Yes, but it would be much more cleaner. Everyone would see what
7 > actually happens. Now its hidden from the user, but not changing
8 > the fact that they're different.
9
10 __ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ ___
11 /_ /_ | | (_) | / / | | | | _ /_ | |__ \
12 __ _| || |______| |_| |__ ___ / /_ _| |_| | ___| |_ ______| | ) |
13 \ \/ / || |______| | | '_ \/ __| / / _` | __| |/ /_ _|______| | / /
14 > <| || | | | | |_) \__ \/ / (_| | |_| < |_| | |_ / /_
15 /_/\_\_||_| |_|_|_.__/|___/_/ \__, |\__|_|\_\ |_(_)____|
16 __/ |
17 |___/
18
19 Tell me, where is it actually hidden?
20
21 > I tend to avoid such unstable packages.
22
23 Nice for you. We don't care.
24
25 > Thanks for the warning of neon, so I'll never even think of using it.
26
27 Nice for you. We don't care.
28
29 > Of course. They're different packages.
30
31 They have the same name. Different versions. That's how it is upstream and how
32 it should be.
33
34 --
35 Kind Regards,
36
37 Simon Stelling
38 Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
39 --
40 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list