1 |
Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
2 |
>> If we changed the name of a package every time there was an API break, |
3 |
>> we would literally have thousands of packages in the tree that essentially |
4 |
>> do the same thing, just with different API's. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Yes, but it would be much more cleaner. Everyone would see what |
7 |
> actually happens. Now its hidden from the user, but not changing |
8 |
> the fact that they're different. |
9 |
|
10 |
__ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ ___ |
11 |
/_ /_ | | (_) | / / | | | | _ /_ | |__ \ |
12 |
__ _| || |______| |_| |__ ___ / /_ _| |_| | ___| |_ ______| | ) | |
13 |
\ \/ / || |______| | | '_ \/ __| / / _` | __| |/ /_ _|______| | / / |
14 |
> <| || | | | | |_) \__ \/ / (_| | |_| < |_| | |_ / /_ |
15 |
/_/\_\_||_| |_|_|_.__/|___/_/ \__, |\__|_|\_\ |_(_)____| |
16 |
__/ | |
17 |
|___/ |
18 |
|
19 |
Tell me, where is it actually hidden? |
20 |
|
21 |
> I tend to avoid such unstable packages. |
22 |
|
23 |
Nice for you. We don't care. |
24 |
|
25 |
> Thanks for the warning of neon, so I'll never even think of using it. |
26 |
|
27 |
Nice for you. We don't care. |
28 |
|
29 |
> Of course. They're different packages. |
30 |
|
31 |
They have the same name. Different versions. That's how it is upstream and how |
32 |
it should be. |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Kind Regards, |
36 |
|
37 |
Simon Stelling |
38 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer |
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |