Archives
Archives
| From: | Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: taking a break from arches stabilization | ||
| Date: | Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:27:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1eb5d6d5-78af-ca37-4708-f00fdb42ddc2@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: taking a break from arches stabilization by Thomas Deutschmann |
||
| 1 | On 07/12/2017 12:13 AM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
| 2 | > Question is what's more a problem: Having an outdated stable package |
| 3 | > because nobody cared about stabilizing a new version (in most cases this |
| 4 | > will end with a rushed stabilization once a security bug was fixed in |
| 5 | > the package) or move a package in time from ~ARCH to ARCH and deal with |
| 6 | > the fallout sometimes. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Easy, keep the working package any time |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 12 | OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 13 | fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: taking a break from arches stabilization | Marek Szuba <marecki@g.o> |