| 1 |
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 23:48:06 +0000 |
| 2 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 5 |
> Hash: SHA512 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Alec Warner: |
| 8 |
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Object or forever hold your peace. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Or argue for 100 posts, either way. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Sounds good, but how do we get consistency in there? I mean... this |
| 15 |
> only works if we have some sort of consensus about tag names, at least |
| 16 |
> more common ones. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
By aggregating a global list of tag names; that way, when you tag a |
| 19 |
package you can look for tags on the global list that apply to it, and |
| 20 |
if it happens two different ways to name something were brought up you |
| 21 |
can also discuss it with one another. I don't think the inconsistency |
| 22 |
would become of a size to be concerned about; but yes, at the very |
| 23 |
least we need to watch out in the beginning to not let it happen... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Though, choosing the right tag naming early on might be a need for |
| 26 |
this to succeed; maybe we can brainstorm some examples of how packages |
| 27 |
would be tagged, to get an idea about it. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
With kind regards, |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 33 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 36 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 37 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives