Archives
Archives
| From: | Maik Schreiber <blizzy@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:28:06 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20021217102535.GB3468@wolverine.hh.iq-computing.de | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? by foser |
||
| 1 | > And i'm not sure it's a good idea to stabilize top packages while some |
| 2 | > of it's -needed- deps are still masked testing, i mean this will break |
| 3 | > things like -u world won't it ? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Yes, but this is a problem in Portage (emerge). It really shouldn't break. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | > PS. (devs only) Is all this crossposting necessary? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | In my opinion, I think it is. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Maik Schreiber, Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 13 | http://www.gentoo.org |
| 14 | mailto:blizzy@g.o |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? | foser <foser@×××××××××××××.net> |