Archives
Archives
| From: | foser <foser@×××××××××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:15:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | 3DFF30C3.6080106@foser.warande.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? by Maik Schreiber |
||
| 1 | Maik Schreiber wrote: |
| 2 | >>And i'm not sure it's a good idea to stabilize top packages while some |
| 3 | >>of it's -needed- deps are still masked testing, i mean this will break |
| 4 | >>things like -u world won't it ? |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Yes, but this is a problem in Portage (emerge). It really shouldn't break. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | So, we're talking features not in portage yet. As it is imho it is |
| 10 | better to mask top packages with masked deps. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | - foser |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |