| 1 |
Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Monday 05 June 2006 20:08, Harald van Dijk wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>No, the decision with the gtk/gtk2 USE flag mess was to have package |
| 7 |
>>maintainers decide for each ebuild whether to support only gtk1 or only |
| 8 |
>>gtk2, but not have support for both in a single ebuild. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>I know about the decision of the Gnome team, but there also was a thread with |
| 13 |
>maintainers refusing to remove optional gtk1|2 support, if I recall |
| 14 |
>correctly. Personally I couldn't care less, as long as the gtk2 flag is |
| 15 |
>history. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
Sorry for the offtopic of this, but what would a user set as the |
| 19 |
useflags to have GTK-2 used by default, and GTK-1 for apps that only |
| 20 |
support it? (but not build GTK-2-capable apps with GTK-1) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Just wondering, because I know that gmplayer is from the mplayer |
| 23 |
package's gtk flag.. its gtk-1 so its not the optimal, but since i don't |
| 24 |
know of a gtk2 version (i do have kmplayer tho.. so its sorta a moot |
| 25 |
point for me.. i think its time i clean my install..) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Anyways, I agree that some of the defaults are a bit more liberal then i |
| 28 |
would perfer, but hey, i can change anything i want (thats the power of |
| 29 |
gentoo) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Thanks, |
| 32 |
Andrew |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives